Tuesday, June 26, 2012

GOOD NEIGHBOURS



JUNE 26 — Dear Indonesians,
I write to you as a Malaysian citizen who is appalled at the latest Jalur Gemilang burning ceremony in Jakarta. I sincerely hope that this open letter reaches you wherever you may be, and translated into languages that you can read and understand.
Over the last few years, Malaysians have watched in horror at how you treated our Jalur Gemilang and our embassy staff. We have witnessed the throwing of faeces, bricks, rocks and other objects at our embassy and endured the continuous threat, insults and jeers hurled at us, our officials, and yes even our athletes during the last SEA Games.
Remember one Chris Ardi Toruan who once pointed to Malaysian pressmen during the SEA Games in November 2011 saying: “Ini semua orang Malaysia, mereka tiada otak”?
Well, this “tiada otak” Malaysian certainly does.
Perhaps you have forgotten that there are not less than two million registered Indonesians in Malaysia, eking out a living in our plantations, construction and domestic sectors to feed their families back home.
We have so far played the role of a gracious host where they are accepted and treated with dignity and free to move around this country without fear of repercussion from Malaysians, regardless of the demonstrations in Jakarta. Come to KL during Hari Raya and other festive seasons to see for yourself our metropolis becoming a “little Indonesia.”
I cannot think of a time when we were not accommodating. Why, I remembered seeing your countrymen break into a celebratory dance at Dataran Merdeka after winning the Thomas Cup against us some 20 years ago without worrying about retaliation from the host country.
Can you imagine if the results were reversed, and what would happen to Malaysians cheering in Indonesia?
Where else would you find such a tolerant host? The Americans? The Europeans? The hate crimes reported against Muslims have yet to have an end in sight after so many years of the war on terror!
No doubt there are cases where Indonesians are abused, but this is the exception and not the norm. Those responsible for the abuse were not protected, and in fact they were severely prosecuted in the court of law. Nirmala Bonat, the Indonesian maid who was abused by her employer, gained sympathy from Malaysians from all walks of life.
Her employer Yim Pek Ha was initially sentenced to 18 years in prison before the Court of Appeal reduced it to 12, for causing grievous hurt to her maid.
It is the same with the Indonesian maids who caused grief to their employers. We have seen maids abusing toddlers, stepping on them, hitting them and even starving them over the years. Some employers were even found murdered by their maids. But like I said earlier, these are exceptions and do not affect our impression towards your country.
Otherwise there would be a rally outside your embassy in KL.
Emotions should never interfere with diplomacy which is the reflection of rationale and logic. We should let our leaders discuss and sort out our differences, implementing measures that will prevent further abuse of both the employers and the employees. We must give way to diplomacy for the sake of our two great nations.
Believe it or not it is in our best interest to see you grow. From Tun Dr Mahathir’s era of prospering-thy-neighbour policy, we now have numerous Malaysian companies operating in Indonesia. 
Among the notable ones are Sime Darby Bhd, IOI Corp Bhd, Kuala Lumpur Kepong Bhd (KLK) and Genting Plantations Bhd which have invested in about 602,000 hectares of oil palm plantations in Indonesia as of 2010, not to mention the CIMB Group, Axiata Bhd, AirAsia, Petronas who have also poured billions and billions of US dollars into your country.
For reasons only known to the Malaysian government, we also have students in your universities. To appreciate the enormity of it, the total Malaysian investment in Indonesia between 2004 and 2009 stood at US$2.1 billion (RM6.7 billion) against the total foreign direct investment flow into Indonesia for the same period of US$36.6 billion.
Putting at risk the years of co-operation and camaraderie between our countries for a dance that most Malaysians have not heard of is not only foolish but also premature.
Maybe this is just my “tiada otak” talking, but I would be proud if another country adopts my culture and nationalises it as their own. Instead of burning and desecrating their flags, I would do everything I can to support their endeavour to ensure the continued survival and propagation of the said culture. After all in this borderless world, we are all citizens of one big nation — Earth.
Be that as it may, all you had to do was ask and we will definitely discuss and debate it like any mature, independent democracy in the spirit of co-operation between two ASEAN nations.
But look at what have you done now and what have you achieved? 
We are neighbours and nothing is too big or complicated for diplomacy. We can never have too many friends, but cannot afford a single enemy less we desire interference from world powers who are ever ready to meddle in our policies.
Learn to be more diplomatic, dear Indonesians, and use the newly found freedom to demonstrate wisely while we Malaysians are still forgiving and tolerant. Learn that there is a limit to any patience, and I am sure you’d understand why ours is growing thin.
We can look away once or twice, but do not take our hospitality for granted as it is not infinite.
Dr Kamal Amzan

Friday, June 22, 2012

It’s all about ‘mee’


It’s all about ‘mee’


HIGH-FRYERS: The Penang ‘mee rebus’ has won fans and fame in Malaysia, thanks to a few good Mamak who are still ‘frying high’ even after more than half a century

Mohd Sultan is the man behind the stall.
Mohd Sultan is the man behind the stall.
  GEORGE TOWN: EVEN if you haven’t tasted it, you surely would have heard of the Penang mee rebus. But where can you find it these days?
   It is a dish that is fast disappearing from Penang’s landscape of hawker stalls, but thankfully, the Mamak who has been feeding my family our regular doses of  mee rebus since the 1970s is still “frying high”.
  The so-called mee Mamak in Kuala Lumpur tends to be laden with soy sauce, which makes it dark, dry and unappetising.
  The Penang version is a delicious, red colour from the specially-made chilli sauce.
  Mee rebus is a meal in itself, laden with yummy goodness like cuttlefish, prawn fritters, beef, egg, potato, tauhu and of course, the all-important  taugeh which gives it that fresh crunchiness.
  The secret is in the sauce, which should be thick and hot, with a tinge of sourness. And the only person I trust to do it properly is Mahboob of Mee Rebus Bangkok Lane fame.
  The stall is the keystone of the corner coffee shop in Lorong Bangkok, off Jalan Burmah.
  Having started at 15 to help his father, Mohamad Zakaria at the stall after school, Mahboob was ready to step into his old man’s shoes when he was taken ill.
  From the time he had a full afro till now, when he sports nothing more than a bald pate, Mahboob has been whizzing about behind the piles of ingredients on the stall shelf; a pinch of this, a sprinkle of that, Mahboob is on auto-pilot after 42 years on the job.
  Long before Merdeka, his father sold noodles out of a pushcart (in the pre-tricycle days), in nearby Bagan Jermal. Tired of being harangued by the British-run Municipal authority, he set up shop at the current location in 1949. Mahboob offers the same fare his father did —mee rebus, mee goreng, kway teow, bihun and pasembur.
  It is the original mee rebus that the noodle connoisseurs order, but he says: “The new generation don’t seem to go for it. They prefer the fried mee, probably because they don’t want to have to worry about the sauce spilling onto their clothes.”
  Indeed,  mee rebus ranks as high in the danger-to-clothing stakes as spaghetti.
  Still, Mahboob is content that the regulars, including those who’ve lived abroad, have returned to seek him out. These have even taken the  mee rebus to far flung places.
  “Before Australia banned food items, parents visiting their children studying there would take it there. Now I’ve people taking it with them to China and Egypt.”
  The biggest order he has had for despatch abroad was 50 packs.
  With air travel and refrigeration, this is not unusual.
  Penang food buffs worried that their favourite hawker food might go the way of the dodo will be relieved to know that Mahboob has his son, Sabiq, all ready to take the baton.
  ’Mee Agong’/’Mee CRC’
  The name “Mee CRC” came from the stall’s old location outside the Chinese Recreation Club. Its current spot in Larut Cafe in Jalan Larut, is its fourth home.
  The stall was started four generations back by Mohd Musa, who set up his stall at the Pykett Methodist School canteen in 1941 before deciding to set up shop on a pushcart along Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, then known as Jalan Northam. It was here, in the early 1960s, that Raja Perlis, the then Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, upon passing by, got his aide to order the mee rebus.
  He liked it and became a regular. What an endorsement. Since then, it has been known among regular customers as mee Agong.
  Road works there sent Mohd Musa and son, Nagoor Meerah, to peddle the noodles outside the Chinese Recreation Club (CRC) but for the last 22 years, the stall has been in Larut CafĂ©, and run by Nagoor’s son, Mohd Razali. He is now grooming his nephew, Muhammad Faris Abdul Aziz to take over the family business.
  The stall offers the full array of noodles. but for me, it is the mee goreng it does best.  The mee Agong is also nice because even fried, the  mee is moist.
 ’Mee Sultan’
  Mee Sultan used to be in Lorong Swatow, outside New World Park, a former entertainment venue from pre-Independence days.
  The stall proprietor, Mohd Sultan Mydin still remembers the pre-war days when joget sessions featuring P. Ramlee and Ahmad Nawab, and boxing tournaments were held at the park.
  He moved the stall there from Jalan Argyll in 1980.
  Lorong Swatow was a popular eating place with a Chinese kopitiam supplying the drinks, an ais kacang seller and a popiah stall.
  Apart from the standard noodles, Mee Sultan also serves pasembur but my all-time favourite has to be his kway teow goreng , which is moist like char kway teow but red and spicy.  
  All the stalls had to move out while New World Park was demolished for re-development. Nobody seemed to know where Mamak Sultan had gone. I was gutted. Mee Sultan sightings were posted on Facebook, but nobody could take me to it.
  Then, when the site reopened as a food and retail outlet in 2007, there he was. What a lovely surprise!
  He’s been there ever since, cooking up a regular treat that has fans  wiping chilli-induced sweat from their brows and calling for ice-cream  ais kacang from the nearby stall.
   The 73-year old has many fans indeed. Last year, his regular customers enjoyed a novelty in the form of a “Mat Salleh” frying the noodles in his place.
  It was his son-in-law, Norwegian Mohamad Thomas Broen who was giving the Mamak a hand before claiming that of his daughter, Habsah and whisking her back to Norway with him.
  Although his children are not interested in the business, Mamak Sultan can rest easy as his nephew, Kadir Mydin is ready to take over the business.
  Perhaps it is because upon reaching your 50s, you are hit by nostalgia for all the good things past, but I would hate for these hawker delights to vanish from our culinary repertoire because of a lack of interest from the younger generation.
  Fortunately, this might just not happen in my lifetime.

Friday, June 8, 2012

stories from my uterus


so i guess people already know that we're pregnant; i'm 14 weeks in and ariff is 28 years and counting. yeay! i've been meaning to write about all the memories i suppose i should immortalize but of course, i haven't :) so i shall make a list of things i think i should write about:

1. funny things
2. weird things

yes. shall get to it once i finish this pint of ice cream. oh yeah....

Tuesday, June 5, 2012


6 Leadership Styles, And When You Should Use Them

BY ROBYN BENINCASA

Taking a team from ordinary to extraordinary means understanding and embracing the difference between management and leadership. According to writer and consultant Peter Drucker, "Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things." 
Manager and leader are two completely different roles, although we often use the terms interchangeably. Managers are facilitators of their team members’ success. They ensure that their people have everything they need to be productive and successful; that they’re well trained, happy and have minimal roadblocks in their path; that they’re being groomed for the next level; that they are recognized for great performance and coached through their challenges.
Conversely, a leader can be anyone on the team who has a particular talent, who is creatively thinking out of the box and has a great idea, who has experience in a certain aspect of the business or project that can prove useful to the manager and the team. A leader leads based on strengths, not titles.
The best managers consistently allow different leaders to emerge and inspire their teammates (and themselves!) to the next level.
When you’re dealing with ongoing challenges and changes, and you’re in uncharted territory with no means of knowing what comes next, no one can be expected to have all the answers or rule the team with an iron fist based solely on the title on their business card. It just doesn’t work for day-to-day operations. Sometimes a project is a long series of obstacles and opportunities coming at you at high speed, and you need every ounce of your collective hearts and minds and skill sets to get through it.
This is why the military style of top-down leadership is never effective in the fast-paced world of adventure racing or, for that matter, our daily lives (which is really one big, long adventure, hopefully!). I truly believe in Tom Peters’s observation that the best leaders don’t create followers; they create more leaders. When we share leadership, we’re all a heck of a lot smarter, more nimble and more capable in the long run, especially when that long run is fraught with unknown and unforeseen challenges.
Change leadership styles
Not only do the greatest teammates allow different leaders to consistently emerge based on their strengths, but also they realize that leadership can and should be situational, depending on the needs of the team. Sometimes a teammate needs a warm hug. Sometimes the team needs a visionary, a new style of coaching, someone to lead the way or even, on occasion, a kick in the bike shorts. For that reason, great leaders choose their leadership style like a golfer chooses his or her club, with a calculated analysis of the matter at hand, the end goal and the best tool for the job.
My favorite study on the subject of kinetic leadership is Daniel Goleman’s Leadership That Gets Resultsa landmark 2000 Harvard Business Review study. Goleman and his team completed a three-year study with over 3,000 middle-level managers. Their goal was to uncover specific leadership behaviors and determine their effect on the corporate climate and each leadership style’s effect on bottom-line profitability.
The research discovered that a manager’s leadership style was responsible for 30% of the company’s bottom-line profitability! That’s far too much to ignore. Imagine how much money and effort a company spends on new processes, efficiencies, and cost-cutting methods in an effort to add even one percent to bottom-line profitability, and compare that to simply inspiring managers to be more kinetic with their leadership styles. It’s a no-brainer.
Here are the six leadership styles Goleman uncovered among the managers he studied, as well as a brief analysis of the effects of each style on the corporate climate:
  1. The pacesetting leader expects and models excellence and self-direction. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Do as I do, now.” The pacesetting style works best when the team is already motivated and skilled, and the leader needs quick results. Used extensively, however, this style can overwhelm team members and squelch innovation.
  2. The authoritative leader mobilizes the team toward a common vision and focuses on end goals, leaving the means up to each individual. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Come with me.” The authoritative style works best when the team needs a new vision because circumstances have changed, or when explicit guidance is not required. Authoritative leaders inspire an entrepreneurial spirit and vibrant enthusiasm for the mission. It is not the best fit when the leader is working with a team of experts who know more than him or her.
  3. The affiliative leader works to create emotional bonds that bring a feeling of bonding and belonging to the organization. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “People come first.” The affiliative style works best in times of stress, when teammates need to heal from a trauma, or when the team needs to rebuild trust. This style should not be used exclusively, because a sole reliance on praise and nurturing can foster mediocre performance and a lack of direction.
  4. The coaching leader develops people for the future. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Try this.” The coaching style works best when the leader wants to help teammates build lasting personal strengths that make them more successful overall. It is least effective when teammates are defiant and unwilling to change or learn, or if the leader lacks proficiency.
  5. The coercive leader demands immediate compliance. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Do what I tell you.” The coercive style is most effective in times of crisis, such as in a company turnaround or a takeover attempt, or during an actual emergency like a tornado or a fire. This style can also help control a problem teammate when everything else has failed. However, it should be avoided in almost every other case because it can alienate people and stifle flexibility and inventiveness.
  6. The democratic leader builds consensus through participation. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “What do you think?” The democratic style is most effective when the leader needs the team to buy into or have ownership of a decision, plan, or goal, or if he or she is uncertain and needs fresh ideas from qualified teammates. It is not the best choice in an emergency situation, when time is of the essence for another reason or when teammates are not informed enough to offer sufficient guidance to the leader.
Bottom line? If you take two cups of authoritative leadership, one cup of democratic, coaching, and affiliative leadership, and a dash of pacesetting and coercive leadership “to taste,” and you lead based on need in a way that elevates and inspires your team, you’ve got an excellent recipe for long-term leadership success with every team in your life.

So how do we tell everyone the great news?


         Pop-Up 'Countdown' Calender from our Australian friends, Andrew & Claire (01/06/2012)



       Making our first baby announcement to the world on FB at 13 weeks/end of 1st trimester (01/06/2012)


Here's to counting the days....and making the days count =)